What Happened to Mother Teresa?
Category: Unitarian Universalism - General
Time magazine’s “Mother Teresa’s Crisis of Faith” blew my mind.
The article, by David Van Biema, analyzes a collection of letters by Mother Teresa, which are being published for the first time in the upcoming book Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light. In these letters, which cover most of her adult life, Mother Teresa laments that she does not feel Jesus’s love or presence. She is aware of the painful contrast between her inner reality and the public image she projects, and between her sense of “emptiness” and the experience she had earlier in life of Jesus’s presence and guidance.
Jesuit James Martin is quoted by Biema as saying that Mother Teresa’s letters “may be remembered as just as important as her ministry to the poor. It would be a ministry to people who had experienced some doubt, some absence of God in their lives. And you know who that is? Everybody. Atheists, doubters, seekers, believers, everyone.”
I would hesitate to go quite as far as Martin does in extolling the universality of Mother Teresa’s faith journey.
Mother Teresa’s spiritual life is grounded in Catholicism. She is writing about the absence of Jesus. Her reaction to her sense of Jesus’s absence, in the extreme turmoil it causes her, in her decision to hide this turmoil from the public, in her ultimate analysis of this suffering, is strongly informed by Catholicism.
That said, people of faith in many traditions will be fascinated by her letters, recognizing the questions about faith, doubt, witness and service that transcend the particularities of any one tradition. Time calls in a host of experts to offer opinions in the article, but really, we don’t have to be psychologists to grapple with the problems posed in Mother Teresa’s letters.
As I read the article, so many questions came to my mind: How did Mother Teresa’s work in the clinics impact her relationship with Jesus? The article notes that her sense of Jesus’s absence came almost immediately after beginning her outreach to the very poor in Calcutta. About nine years ago, I visited several of the clinics in Calcutta started by Mother Teresa. It was shocking to see the meager conditions in these clinics and the extreme suffering that brought people there. I can only imagine the shock Mother Teresa felt, moving to Calcutta from Ireland, taking on voluntary poverty, and serving those who were among the very poorest of the poor.
What kept her going? How did she find the hope to continue her work?
Mother Teresa continued to believe in Jesus and to seek a relationship with him, even as she was in despair over his absence from her life. What bolstered her faith in Jesus?
How did Mother Teresa’s ideas about gender roles shape her understanding of her relationship with Jesus, and of her suffering? In her description of a conversation she had with Jesus, he refers to her as his “Spouse.” How did she understand their marriage, and her obligations as a “Spouse,” as he grew distant from her? Martin begins to get at this question in his comparing Mother Teresa to a spouse caring for an ill loved one, and I am hopeful that feminist scholars will weigh in on these questions as well.
When Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light is published next week, all of us will have the chance to read her letters in full and interpret their meaning. Mother Teresa is not only a religious figure who lived a life of incredible service, but also a cultural icon. The publication of her letters will inspire conversation across the world about faith and doubt.

August 30th, 2007 14:41
I know that there are other ideas about Mother Teresa not being a living saint. There is some thought that she was a bit of a tool for fund raising for the church. That isn’t very Jesus like… I know in the book God is not Great there is a section devoted to her. I know it caused me to have mixed reactions about her even without reading her personal letters.
August 30th, 2007 17:06
Penn & Teller did a program about Mother Theresa, Gandhi and a third person (can’t recall right now). You can vie it on YouTube. I don’t know that I can morally agree with the notion that only through suffering can you be close to God. While suffering is part of the human condition, it’s one thing to accept that and another to reinforce it or perpetuate it. And she did raise 50 million dollars, most of which went to the church, not to the poor.
Also, this reminds me of something - I should write a post about it. It’s about whether leaders should ever confess doubts about their beliefs or in their belief systems.
August 31st, 2007 12:04
Jacqueline and Hafidha,
Thank you for commenting. As I read your comments, they raised a question for me about how fundraising for one’s own church or denomination should be understood: Is it on par with charity? Is it a moral obligation? How should it be balanced with fundraising or donating to causes that provide for people’s direct material needs?
Jacqueline, Thanks for the recommendation of God is Not Great.
Hafidha, Your idea for a post about whether leaders should confess doubts about their belief systems is a great idea. One practical instance in which this comes out is when a congregational minister’s beliefs change over time. If she starts out a deist in a God-believing congregation, and over time becomes a humanist, should she share these changes with the congregation, or not do so at the risk of being false?
September 3rd, 2007 16:05
Such interesting posts, Shelby. I am especially interested in questions about MT because, based on my very minimal knowledge of her, I was never that thrilled with things - maybe either a sense of making suffering people comfortable, rather than doing more to advocate for the changes in systems that contribute to that suffering, and also a sense that she wasn’t being totally real. Guess it seems like I was a tad on target with that second one. Also, as for whether religious leaders should express doubts, I think that a BIG YES is my take on it. Otherwise, it gives your everyday person on the street the sense either that 1) they need to doubt less because look at the leaders who never doubt, rather than affirming the need to struggle with difficult religious questions that almost always involve doubt and 2) they have the sense that religious leaders are lying and pretending never to doubt or change, which is often the truth if religious leaders act as if they have it all together spiritually and never doubt and never change. Just my (long) two cents. Thanks for these posts :)
September 4th, 2007 18:29
Elizabeth,
The comments I’ve gotten on this post, including yours, have been eye-opening. I hadn’t considered some of the other possible criticisms of Mother Teresa, including her fundraising for the church and her focus on direct service rather than systemic change.