<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruth and Naomi - Part II</title>
	<link>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii</link>
	<description>Religion and spirituality from a Unitarian Universalist perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Ruth and Naomi - Part I Looking for Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-4617</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Ruth and Naomi - Part I Looking for Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading sermon on Ruth and Naomi      _uacct = "UA-1338075-1"; urchinTracker();       Stumble it!  Save This Page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Continue reading sermon on Ruth and Naomi      _uacct = &#8220;UA-1338075-1&#8243;; urchinTracker();       Stumble it!  Save This Page [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelby Meyerhoff</title>
		<link>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby Meyerhoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>Nathan, 

Thank you for raising this point. Ruth's social status is definitely an important part of the story. We know from the text that she and Naomi are in a financially unstable situation, which is why she has to go into the fields to glean after the harvest. It is also clear that because of her status as a "foreigner" in Judah, Ruth is surprised when Boaz treats her well. And we know that Ruth was raised in a different religion (the Moabite religion, not that of Israel), although she seems to convert when she meets Naomi. The Book of Ruth could be an excellent text for a discussion group about relationships between people of different backgrounds and social locations.

However, I don't know enough about the historical context to say whether being a Moabite in Judah then is comparable to being BGL and/or a person of color now. It's not clear to me from the text and from the commentaries that I read that there was a system of oppression designed to deny rights to Moabites in Judah in the same way that gays, lesbians, bisexuals and people of color are systematically denied rights in America today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, </p>
<p>Thank you for raising this point. Ruth&#8217;s social status is definitely an important part of the story. We know from the text that she and Naomi are in a financially unstable situation, which is why she has to go into the fields to glean after the harvest. It is also clear that because of her status as a &#8220;foreigner&#8221; in Judah, Ruth is surprised when Boaz treats her well. And we know that Ruth was raised in a different religion (the Moabite religion, not that of Israel), although she seems to convert when she meets Naomi. The Book of Ruth could be an excellent text for a discussion group about relationships between people of different backgrounds and social locations.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t know enough about the historical context to say whether being a Moabite in Judah then is comparable to being BGL and/or a person of color now. It&#8217;s not clear to me from the text and from the commentaries that I read that there was a system of oppression designed to deny rights to Moabites in Judah in the same way that gays, lesbians, bisexuals and people of color are systematically denied rights in America today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lookingforfaith.org/blog/2007/ruth-and-naomi-part-ii#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>The Book of Ruth is most likely an allegory. The late science fiction writer, Isaac Asimov, once published an essay on it. He said that to understand the Book of Ruth, whenever we see the word "Moabite" we should substitute the word "black." We can also read "Moabite" as "gay," "lesbian," "bisexual," etc. I hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Book of Ruth is most likely an allegory. The late science fiction writer, Isaac Asimov, once published an essay on it. He said that to understand the Book of Ruth, whenever we see the word &#8220;Moabite&#8221; we should substitute the word &#8220;black.&#8221; We can also read &#8220;Moabite&#8221; as &#8220;gay,&#8221; &#8220;lesbian,&#8221; &#8220;bisexual,&#8221; etc. I hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
